UMC Accountants
  • Home
  • Services
  • Insights & updates
  • Contact Us
  • 中文

2025 Tax Changes Are Impacting UK Business Owners

17/4/2025

 

HOW Business Owners Can Stay Ahead in 2025

​The UK’s tax and accounting landscape in 2025 brings challenges for business owners - particularly with increased HMRC scrutiny, rising corporation tax rates, and upcoming Making Tax Digital (MTD) deadlines. These shifts mean it's more important than ever to have proactive financial strategies in place.

Key Risks in 2025:

Corporation tax up to 25% for profits over £250,000;

MTD for Income Tax starting April 2026—early prep needed;

Increased HMRC investigations into small businesses;

Rising costs and tighter cash flow post-inflation and higher interest rates.

Case Study: Managing Risk for a Growing Consultancy

A South London consultancy with £400,000 annual turnover and rising profits was suddenly pushed into the 25% corporation tax bracket. Their records were spreadsheet-based, leaving them unprepared for MTD compliance.

We implemented a cloud accounting system, restructured director remuneration to lower taxable profit, and initiated quarterly tax planning reviews. This not only made them MTD-ready but saved them £12,000 in tax annually, while improving cash flow forecasting.

Advisory Action Plan:

Move to digital accounting systems now;

Review tax efficiency of salary/dividend mix;

Use pension contributions or capital allowances to lower taxable profits;

Schedule quarterly reviews with your accountant.

Worried about 2025 tax changes? Let's build a plan that protects your business and your bottom line.

Is It Worth Filling Gaps in Your National Insurance Record Before April 2025?

27/3/2025

 
As the 5 April 2025 deadline approaches, a few clients of ours are considering whether they should top up their National Insurance (NI) contributions to cover missing years as far back as 2006–07. But is it worth the money? Let’s break it down with some real-life scenarios.

Why It Matters

Your NI record directly affects your State Pension entitlement. To receive the full new State Pension, you generally need 35 qualifying years. If you have gaps, filling them can boost your pension income significantly – but only if you don’t already have (or won’t get) enough years.

Example 1: Worth Topping Up

Sally, age 55, has only 28 qualifying years and plans to retire at 66. She’ll only accrue 3 more years before retirement, totalling 31 years – 4 years short of the full pension.

Each missed year reduces her pension by about £303 per year (£6,550 ÷ 35). By paying around £824 for one year (2023/24 rate), she can get back £303 annually for life – a solid return if she lives 3+ years beyond pension age.

Conclusion: Definitely worth it.


Example 2: Not Worth It

James, age 60, already has 36 qualifying years. He’s worried he might have underpaid in 2006–07, but since he already qualifies for the full pension, paying extra won’t increase it.

Conclusion: No benefit – save your money.

Key Takeaways:

Check your NI record via your Personal Tax Account on gov.uk.

Don’t assume all gaps are worth filling – check your State Pension forecast via here

The deadline to top up for 2006–07 to 2016–17 is 5 April 2025.
​

Always seek tailored advice if you’re unsure.

How SDLT Group Relief Helps Property Transfers Within a Group

2/3/2025

 

Using SDLT Group Relief for Tax-Efficient Property Transfers

When restructuring a corporate group, transferring property assets between group companies can trigger significant SDLT. ​However, SDLT group relief allows qualifying businesses to transfer properties without incurring SDLT, as long as they meet HMRC’s 75% common ownership rule and maintain the structure for at least three years.

Key benefits of SDLT group relief:


  • No SDLT charge - Eligible property transfers within a group are exempt from SDLT, reducing tax costs.
  • Improved asset management - Allows businesses to centralise property ownership for better financial and tax planning.
  • Facilitates business restructuring - Useful for mergers, demergers, and strategic asset reallocation without excessive tax burdens.

Case Study: How we saved a client £150,000 in SDLT

A property investment company with three subsidiaries needed to transfer a £3M commercial property from one entity to another to improve operational efficiency. Normally this would incur an SDLT charge of £150,000 (5% on £3M). By qualifying for SDLT group relief, we facilitated the transfer tax-free, ensuring compliance with HMRC’s conditions. The restructuring enabled better asset protection and financing flexibility and making the business more scalable.


Planning a property transfer within your group? Get in touch with us.

Strategic Business Valuation for a Real Estate Management Buyout

1/3/2025

 

How to Value a Real Estate Business for a Management Buyout.

For real estate businesses considering a management buyout (MBO), an accurate valuation is crucial to ensure a smooth and profitable transition. As a management accountant, we help business owners and their teams assess the true worth of their company and create a viable financial structure for the buyout.

Key steps in business valuation for MBO:

Assessing financial health – Reviewing past financial statements, rental income, asset values, and liabilities to determine a clear financial position.

Choosing a valuation method – Using EBITDA multiples, net asset valuation/ Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) to establish a fair market price.

Structuring the buyout – Identifying financing options such as seller financing, bank loans, or private investors to facilitate the purchase.

Optimising cash flow – Ensuring the business remains profitable post-buyout by restructuring expenses and maximising operational efficiency.

Case Study: A Real Estate Agency’s Successful Buyback

A South London-based real estate agency with £5M in annual revenue wanted its senior management team to take over ownership. We conducted a full valuation using EBITDA and asset-based valuation, placing the business worth at £2.5M. By securing a mix of vendor financing (50%) and private investment (50%), the buyout was structured with minimal upfront cost. Post-buyout, cash flow forecasting and cost restructuring helped the team improve profitability, making the transition seamless.


Considering a management buyout? Get in touch to find out your business value and create a strategic plan!

Case Study – How We Helped an SME Save £10,000 in Taxes

5/2/2025

 

​Case Study: How an E-Commerce Business Reduced Its Tax Bill by £10,000

One of our clients, a South London-based e-commerce business, was struggling with high tax payments. After a full tax review, our team implemented key strategies that led to significant savings. Here’s how we did it.

Challenges Faced:
​
  • The business wasn’t utilising all allowable deductions.
  • VAT compliance errors led to unnecessary overpayments.
  • Payroll structure wasn’t tax-efficient.

Solutions Implemented:
  • We identified unclaimed expenses worth £5,000.
  • Adjusted VAT filings to recover £3,000 in overpaid taxes.
  • Restructured director remuneration, saving an additional £2,000.

With these adjustments, the business successfully saved £10,000 over the tax year, improving overall cash flow.

If your business is overpaying on taxes, let UMC Accountants conduct a free tax review and help you maximise your savings.

Case Study – How Restructuring a Business Saved Thousands in Tax

2/2/2025

 

Case Study: Optimizing a Business Structure to Maximise Tax Efficiency

As businesses grow, their structures often become complex, leading to potential tax inefficiencies. Whether a company consolidates multiple activities into one entity or operates separate stand-alone companies for each division, a lack of strategic tax planning can result in unnecessary liabilities. Our case study explores how we helped a South London-based business restructure its operations, leading to significant tax savings and a more efficient corporate setup.

Our client, a mid-sized consultancy firm, had expanded rapidly over the years, acquiring different business divisions, each with separate revenue streams. Their structure had evolved in an ad hoc manner, with some activities operating under the same legal entity, while others were managed through separate, stand-alone companies. This setup resulted in:
  • Higher overall tax liabilities due to inefficient allocation of profits and expenses.
  • Increased compliance costs from multiple tax filings and administrative burdens.
  • Reduced flexibility for future investment, divestment, or succession planning.

Our team at UMC Accountants conducted an in-depth review of the company’s corporate structure and the shareholders’ ultimate business objectives. We identified two potential restructuring options to optimise tax efficiency:
​
  1. Establishing a Group Structure with a Holding Company
    • By forming a holding company that owned various subsidiaries, we enabled the client to legally separate its different business activities while retaining tax efficiencies within the group.
    • This structure facilitated group relief, allowing the transfer of tax losses between profitable and non-profitable entities, reducing the overall tax burden.
    • It provided a legally distinct separation between high-risk and low-risk business activities, improving financial security and protecting shareholder assets.
  2. Shareholders Holding Individual Companies Directly
    • For divisions that were potentially saleable in the future, we recommended maintaining them as separate entities without a holding company.
    • This ensured that if a business unit was sold, the shareholders could benefit from Business Asset Disposal Relief (formerly Entrepreneurs' Relief), reducing the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) liability to 10% instead of the standard 20%.

After implementing the restructuring plan:
  • The company saved over £50,000 annually in tax through group relief and strategic profit allocation.
  • Compliance costs were reduced by 30%, as certain reporting obligations were consolidated.
  • The new structure allowed for a future sale of a subsidiary, benefiting from the lower CGT rate.
  • Shareholders had increased financial flexibility for reinvestment and estate planning.

Optimising a business structure is essential for minimizing tax inefficiencies, safeguarding assets, and maximising shareholder value. If your business has multiple divisions or operates under a fragmented structure, a professional review could unlock significant tax savings. Contact UMC Accountants today to explore the best structure for your business.

    Author: 

    UMC Accountants

    Categories

    All
    Case Studies & Success Stories
    Cash Flow Forecast
    Companies House
    Personal Tax Advice
    SDLT
    SME Finance Tips
    Tax Updates

'''That is exactly what I want! Wonderful! Many thanks''
 Isabella I Tai Chi Wellness

''I would highly recommend UMC for their quality of work''
 S Pither I  NPIT
​
''They are not just my accountants, they are also my friend's accountants''
 I Campbell I MLCE



Copyright @ 2012 United Metropolitan Consulting Ltd. 
All Rights Reserved.
Company No. 公司注册号  07817089        
The practice is authorised and regulated by Association of Chartered Certified Accountants in the United Kingdom

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture